Compare

NudgeHost vs GitHub Pages

Published 5 September 2026

Where the two differ on getting to a live link, on what each one publishes as a limit, and on what the terms let you put there.

Figures last verified 5 September 2026

GitHub Pages is a good static host and its ceilings are higher than ours. What it asks for first is an account, a repository and a commit, and then a build that has ten minutes to finish. NudgeHost asks for a file, takes up to 25MB of it before you have signed up for anything, and answers with the address straight away.

nudgehost.com/your-file

What it takes to get a live link

NudgeHost
A file

and a browser, with no account needed to start

No build

step at all, so the address answers as soon as the bytes land

3 links

at once signed out, each running for 7 days

GitHub Pages
An account

a repository, and a commit before anything is live

10 minutes

is where a deployment times out

1 site

per account, for a user or organisation site

Where GitHub Pages is the roomier option

Their ceilings are higher than ours and this page does not pretend otherwise.

NudgeHost
25MB

a file on the free plan, rising to 1GB on Studio

GitHub Pages
1 GB

for a published site, with the same figure recommended for the source repository

What their terms rule out

  • No online business, e-commerce site or commercial SaaS. GitHub's terms for additional products say Pages is not intended or allowed as free web hosting for any of them.
  • No sensitive transactions. Their own docs say sites should not be used for sending passwords or credit card numbers.
  • A password gate on ours. Password protection arrives on Pro and Studio, and link expiry works on the free plan.
  • A soft bandwidth limit of 100 GB a month applies to Pages, and rate limits may apply, answering 429.

Summary

NudgeHost and GitHub Pages summarised by theme, with the side that comes out ahead on each
ThemeNudgeHostGitHub PagesWinner
What you need before you startA file and a browserAn account, a repository and a commitNudgeHost
Publishing without an accountYes, up to 25MBNo, an account and a repository firstNudgeHost
Published size ceiling25MB free, 1GB on Studio1 GB for a published siteGitHub Pages
Source repository ceilingNo repository involved1 GB recommendedGitHub Pages
Build stepNone, the address answers when the bytes landJekyll or an Actions workflow, timing out at 10 minutesNudgeHost
Visitor capsNone on any planA soft bandwidth limit of 100 GB a monthNudgeHost
Running a business on itNo restriction on what a hosted file is used forNot allowed under their termsNudgeHost
Keeping something privateA password on Pro and StudioTheir docs advise against sensitive transactionsNudgeHost
Sites per account10 live links on the free planOne user or organisation siteNudgeHost

At a glance

NudgeHost

  • A live link from a file and a browser, with no repository, no commit and no build in between.
  • A link before an account, up to 25MB and 3 links, each running for 7 days.
  • 10 live links on the free plan at 25MB a file, with no banner on any plan.
  • No restriction in our terms on what a hosted file is used for, so a price list or a client proposal is an ordinary upload.
  • Password protection on Pro and Studio, with link expiry and QR codes working on the free plan.
  • A REST API and an MCP server on every plan, where one call takes a file and returns the address it is reachable at.

GitHub Pages

  • A mature static host for a site that already lives in a repository, with Jekyll and Actions workflows built in.
  • Roomier than our free plan. A published site may be up to 1 GB, and 1 GB is the recommended limit on the source repository.
  • GitHub Free publishes from public repositories. Pro, Team, Enterprise Cloud and Enterprise Server publish from public and private ones.
  • Their terms rule out running an online business, an e-commerce site, or commercial software as a service on it.
  • A soft bandwidth limit of 100 GB a month, a soft limit of 10 builds an hour, and deployments that time out after 10 minutes.

The quick verdict

What to pick between NudgeHost and GitHub Pages, by what you want most
If you wantChoose
A link from a file, with no repositoryNudgeHost
To publish without making an accountNudgeHost
A site larger than our free plan takes, at no costGitHub Pages
To run a price list or an order page on itNudgeHost
The site to live beside the code that builds itGitHub Pages
A password or an expiry date on the linkNudgeHost
One API call that returns a live addressNudgeHost

Getting to a live link

Getting to a live link, comparing NudgeHost and GitHub Pages
FeatureNudgeHostGitHub Pages
What you need before you startA file and a browser. Nothing is installed and nothing is configured firstA GitHub account, a repository, and a commit
Upload without an accountYes, up to 25MB and 3 links, with a working URL before anything asks who you areNo, an account and a repository come first
How you publishDrop the file in and the address answers as soon as the bytes landCommit to the repository, then the Jekyll pipeline or a custom Actions workflow builds and deploys it
Where the file livesIn your account, at its own slug. A ZIP unpacks and serves at its own subdomainIn a repository. Public repositories on GitHub Free, public and private on Pro, Team, Enterprise Cloud and Enterprise Server
Sites per account10 active links on the free plan, each with its own addressOne user or organisation site per account

WinnerNudgeHost

This is the section the comparison turns on. Their sequence has four things in it before a link exists, an account, a repository, a commit and a build, and each one is a place to stop. Ours has the file.

That gap matters most when the file is the whole job. A scanned contract or a slide deck going to one person does not want a repository around it, and on the free plan it does not get one.

The limits each side publishes

The limits each side publishes, comparing NudgeHost and GitHub Pages
FeatureNudgeHostGitHub Pages
Published site size25MB a file on the free plan, 250MB on Pro and 1GB on StudioPublished sites may be no larger than 1 GB
Source size on the free plan25MB a file, which covers an ordinary slide deck or a scanned contractSource repositories have a recommended limit of 1 GB
Visitor capsNone on any planA soft bandwidth limit of 100 GB a month
Build limitsNo build step, so there is nothing to queue and nothing to rebuildA soft limit of 10 builds an hour, which does not apply with a custom Actions workflow
Deployment timeoutNone. The upload either lands or is refused at the point you drop it inDeployments time out after 10 minutes

WinnerNudgeHost

Two of these five rows go to GitHub Pages and the table says so. A 1 GB published site and a 1 GB source repository are both well past what our free plan takes, and if the thing you are putting up is a large site, that is the figure to weigh.

The other three are about what sits between a change and a live page. A build that can queue behind ten an hour and time out at ten minutes is a build you have to think about. Dropping a file in is not.

What you are allowed to put on it

The three NudgeHost plans

What each plan carries, before the comparison starts on price.

The three NudgeHost plans
PlanMonthlyAnnualA fileLive linksAPI accessDomains
Free$025MB10 active links2 API keys at 20 requests a minute0 custom domains
Pro$12/mo$120/yr250MB10 API keys at 60 requests a minute1 custom domain
Studio$29/mo$290/yr1GB30 API keys at 150 requests a minute5 custom domains

GitHub Pages has no plan ladder of its own. The limits above are the same on every GitHub plan, and the one thing paying changes is where the source may live. GitHub Free publishes Pages from public repositories, while Pro, Team, Enterprise Cloud and Enterprise Server publish from public and private ones. The 1 GB ceilings, the 100 GB soft bandwidth limit, the ten builds an hour and the ten minute deployment timeout do not move.

What you are allowed to put on it, comparing NudgeHost and GitHub Pages
FeatureNudgeHostGitHub Pages
Running a business on itNo restriction on what a hosted file is used for. Reselling NudgeHost itself is not allowed.Not allowed. Their terms rule out an online business, an e-commerce site, and commercial software as a service.
Anything you need to keep privateA password on Pro and Studio, and link expiry on every plan including the free one.Their docs say a Pages site should not be used for sensitive transactions such as sending passwords or credit card numbers.
Replacing a file at the same URLEvery plan, keeping the slug, the view count and any password or expiry already set, up to 4MB per replacementA new commit, which re-runs the build within the soft limit of 10 an hour

WinnerNudgeHost

The commercial restriction is the one to read twice, because it is their wording rather than our characterisation. A price list, an order form or a client-facing SaaS page sits outside what GitHub allows on Pages, and a large share of the people looking for a quick host want exactly one of those.

The rest of the section follows from what each product is for. A link you can put a password on, set an expiry against, and replace in place without touching a repository is the shape of a document you are sending to somebody, and you can update the source later on any plan.

For developers and agents

For developers and agents, comparing NudgeHost and GitHub Pages
FeatureNudgeHostGitHub Pages
What one API call doesTakes a file and returns the address it is reachable at, in two calls with the bytes in betweenCommits to a repository, which then has to be configured to publish before an address exists
API access on the free planYes, 2 API keys at 20 requests a minuteA REST API is published and reaches repositories and Pages
MCP serverYes, on every plan, at https://www.nudgehost.com/api/mcp with four toolsYes, GitHub publishes one
Rate limiting20 requests a minute on free, 150 on StudioRate limits may apply, answering 429
Between the call and a live pageNothing. The address answers once the bytes are storedThe Pages build, which times out after 10 minutes

WinnerNudgeHost

Both publish a REST API and both publish an MCP server, so the question is not which of them a script can reach. It is what one call gets you.

Ours takes a file and hands back the address it is reachable at. Theirs writes to a repository, and a repository is not an address until something builds it and something else has been configured to serve it. For an agent that has just generated a file and needs somewhere to put it, that difference is the whole task.

The same upload from a script

The v1 REST API is open on the free plan, at 2 keys and 20 requests a minute, so this runs before any money changes hands.

bash
curl -X POST https://www.nudgehost.com/api/v1/uploads \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer nh_sk_REPLACE_WITH_YOUR_OWN_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "filename": "report.pdf",
    "contentType": "application/pdf",
    "fileSize": 182734
  }'

That answers with the slug, the address the file will have, and a URL to PUT the bytes to. A second call to /api/v1/uploads/{id}/complete finishes it and returns the address the file is actually reachable at. The MCP server answers at https://www.nudgehost.com/api/mcp with four tools, share_text, create_upload_url, complete_upload and list_links, so an AI client can do the same job inside one conversation. Both request and response shapes are set out in the API documentation.

What each one is better at

Where NudgeHost is stronger

  • There is nothing between the file and the link. No repository, no commit, no build and no workflow file. Drop a PDF in and the address answers, or publish an HTML page straight from something a model handed back. The free plan holds 10 of them at 25MB each.
  • You get a URL before you get an account. Drag a file in signed out and it publishes, up to 25MB and 3 links, each running for 7 days. Signing up later takes them over and leaves every address alone.
  • The terms do not tell you what the file is for. Our acceptable-use rules cover malware, illegal content, impersonation, spam and disruption, and they say nothing about commerce. A price list, an order form or a client proposal is an ordinary file here.
  • The link behaves like a document. It can carry a password on Pro, an expiry on any plan, and a replacement file at the same address with the view count intact. None of that involves a commit.

Where GitHub Pages is stronger

  • It is roomier, and free. A published site may be up to 1 GB and the recommended source repository limit is the same. Our free plan takes 25MB a file and Studio takes 1GB, so for a genuinely large site they are the more generous option at no cost.
  • It belongs next to the code. When a site is already a repository, publishing it from that repository is the right answer. Jekyll and Actions workflows are built in, the history is the git history, and a review is a pull request. Nothing here replaces that.

Publishing without an account

The sequence a reader can run before deciding anything. Nothing in it asks for an email address, and the ceiling is 25MB, the same size the free plan takes.

  1. Drop the file in

    Signed out, on the home page. A browser check runs before the upload starts and asks you for nothing. Anything over 25MB is refused at that point rather than part way through.

  2. Take the address

    The link comes back as nudgehost.com and the slug, live as soon as the bytes land. A ZIP that unpacks into a site gets its own subdomain instead, and that is the only case where the address takes a different shape.

  3. Send it

    You can hold 3 of these at once without an account, and each one runs for 7 days. A PDF, an image, a CSV or a JSON file carries nothing extra on the page. A converted Word file, a single HTML page and a page served out of an unpacked ZIP each carry a small attribution line at the foot.

  4. Sign up when you want to keep it

    A free account takes over the files behind your browser, clears the deadline and leaves every address alone. The free plan holds 10 active links, filled newest first, and anything past that stays anonymous and keeps its expiry until a slot opens.

The attribution line is the one thing an account removes from a page that already carries one. Everything else about the link, the address included, is the same before and after you sign up.

Moving from GitHub Pages to NudgeHost

Moving a site across is a file operation. Get the built output onto your own machine, whether that is a folder of HTML, a build directory or a single page, and nothing about the destination needs configuring first.

Then drop it in. A single page goes up as it is, and a folder goes up as an archive that unpacks and serves at its own subdomain, with client-side routing working the way it did locally. There is no workflow file to write and no build to wait for, so the address answers as soon as the upload finishes.

The part that needs planning is the address. A NudgeHost link gets its own slug, and a github.io address you have already circulated will not follow you. Put the new page on your own domain and point the old one at it. Custom domains sit on the Pro plan.

Choose NudgeHost if

  • You have a file rather than a repository, and you want the link now rather than after a build.
  • You want to publish without making an account first, and to claim the link later if you keep it.
  • The page is commercial, a price list, an order form or anything selling something, which their terms rule out.
  • You want a password, an expiry date, or to replace the file at the same address without a commit.
  • You are wiring this into a script or an AI client and want one call that answers with a live address.

Choose GitHub Pages if

  • The site already lives in a repository and is built from it. Publishing from where the code is is the right answer, and Jekyll and Actions workflows are part of their platform rather than bolted on.
  • You need more room than our plans give, at no cost. A published site may be up to 1 GB there, against 25MB a file on our free plan and 1GB on Studio.
  • You want the publish history to be the git history, with changes reviewed as pull requests and reverted as commits. A NudgeHost link keeps the current file and the view count, and nothing about who changed what.

The verdict

GitHub Pages is the better home for a site that is already a repository, and it is more generous on size than our free plan. Neither of those is in dispute on this page.

NudgeHost is the pick when the thing you have is a file and the thing you need is a link. There is no account, no repository, no commit and no build in the way, the free plan holds 10 links at 25MB each, and our terms say nothing about what the file is for, where theirs rule out an online business, an e-commerce site and commercial software as a service.

For the other two products in this category, see how NudgeHost compares to Tiiny.host and NudgeHost vs Linkyhost.

Get started free

Frequently asked questions

  • Is GitHub Pages free?

    Yes, and it is roomier than our free plan. A published site may be up to 1 GB and the recommended limit on a source repository is the same. What it asks for is a GitHub account, a repository and a commit, and then a build that has ten minutes to finish.

  • Can I run a business site on GitHub Pages?

    Their terms say no. The GitHub Terms for Additional Products and Features state that Pages is not intended or allowed as free web hosting to run an online business, an e-commerce site, or any site primarily directed at facilitating commercial transactions or providing commercial software as a service. NudgeHost places no restriction on what a hosted file is used for.

  • Do I need a repository to use NudgeHost?

    No. There is no repository, no commit and no build step. Drop the file into the browser and the address answers as soon as the bytes land, up to 25MB before you have signed up for anything.

  • Can I put a password on a GitHub Pages site?

    Their docs say a Pages site should not be used for sensitive transactions such as sending passwords or credit card numbers. NudgeHost carries password protection on Pro and Studio, and link expiry works on the free plan.

  • How big a file can I put on NudgeHost?

    25MB on the free plan, 250MB on Pro and 1GB on Studio. GitHub Pages allows a published site of up to 1 GB, so for a large static site they have the higher ceiling.

  • Does a busy link cost me anything on either one?

    GitHub publishes a soft bandwidth limit of 100 GB a month on Pages, and notes that rate limits may apply and answer 429. NudgeHost caps no visitors on any plan.

  • How long does publishing take?

    On NudgeHost the address answers as soon as the upload finishes. GitHub Pages builds the site after a commit, with a soft limit of ten builds an hour that does not apply when a custom Actions workflow is used, and a deployment that times out after ten minutes.

  • Can a script or an AI client publish to either?

    Both publish a REST API and an MCP server. The difference is what one call does. A NudgeHost call takes a file and returns the address it is reachable at, on 2 API keys at 20 requests a minute from the free plan. A GitHub call commits to a repository, which then has to be configured to publish before an address exists.

  • Can I keep my custom domain if I move?

    Yes. Custom domains sit on the Pro plan, at 1 custom domain, rising to 5 custom domains on Studio. Point the domain at the new page once it is answering, then retire the old address.

See for yourself

The free plan is genuinely free. Try it before you decide.

Get started free